April 16, 2024
13 mins read

The Role and Impact of Fast Track Courts in the Indian Judicial System

Fast Track Courts, Lawforeverything

On this page you will read detailed information about Role and Impact of Fast Track Courts in the Indian Judicial System.

In your role within the legal system, you encounter various court systems and procedures on a regular basis. One such judicial process intended to expedite certain cases is the fast track court system in India. As you review the background and impacts of this specialized court structure designed to conclude cases within prescribed timeframes, you gain insight into innovative approaches to judicial administration. This 101-word introduction aims to pique your interest as we explore the underlying rationale, implementation, and measurable effects of fast track courts enacted to unclog India’s overwhelmed legal apparatus. Delving into the genesis and aftermath of this bold Indian judicial experiment promises to illuminate the unfolding relationship between expedited case resolution, protected rights, and realized justice.

What Are Fast Track Courts in India?

Fast track courts are special courts set up in India to reduce the backlog of cases in regular courts. These courts are designated to hear cases of a specific nature, like crimes against women, children, elderly, civil disputes, etc. Fast track courts were first established in 2000 to expedite the trial process.

The Indian judicial system has an enormous backlog of over 3.5 crore cases pending in various courts across the country. Fast track courts were set up to reduce this burden on the regular courts so they can focus on priority cases that require speedy trials and verdicts. These courts follow the same procedures as regular courts but are not bound by the same timelines. Cases that have been pending for years in regular courts are transferred to fast track courts so they can be resolved quickly.

Some of the key objectives and benefits of fast track courts are:

  • Providing speedy justice to litigants.
  • Reducing the huge backlog of cases in regular courts.
  • Fast-tracking important cases like crimes against women and children.
  • Ensuring timely justice and relief to victims.
  • Improving the overall efficiency of the judicial system.
  • Restoring faith in the judiciary by disposing of cases in a time-bound manner.

The establishment of fast track courts has significantly improved the Indian judicial system. These courts have helped in reducing pendency, improving clearance rates, and providing speedy trials and justice. However, there is still a long way to go to overcome the chronic delays and backlogs in the system. More fast track courts are needed across India to continue the mission of delivering swift and fair justice to all.

When and Why Were Fast Track Courts Introduced?

In the year 2000, the Government of India introduced Fast Track Courts (FTCs), also known as Fast Track Special Courts, to expedite the legal process and reduce the backlog of cases in the Indian judicial system. The FTCs were established under the eleventh five-year plan of the government to facilitate speedy trials and timely justice, especially for under trials who had been incarcerated for long periods.

The FTCs were initially set up for a limited period of five years to dispose of long-pending cases related to dowry death, child abuse, and communal riots. The programme was later extended in 2005 to clear other pending cases like rape, murder, dacoity, kidnapping, and extortion across the country. The establishment of FTCs aimed to restore public confidence in the judicial system by disposing of more than two million pending cases across different courts in India.

Some of the reasons why Fast Track Courts were introduced:

  • Huge backlog of court cases which delayed trials and justice for years. The FTCs helped in speedy disposal of pending cases.
  • Prolonged incarceration of under trials in prisons for petty offences due to delayed trials. The FTCs facilitated the release of under trials from jails after speedy trials.
  • Delayed justice in sensitive cases like dowry deaths, rapes and communal riots which affected the society and victims. The FTCs ensured swift justice in these cases.
  • Lack of adequate number of judges and court infrastructure which led to overburdening of existing courts. The FTCs eased the workload of regular courts.
  • Public dissatisfaction with the judicial system due to delayed trials and justice. The FTCs restored people’s faith in the Indian judiciary by delivering speedy justice.

In conclusion, Fast Track Courts were established in India to overcome the shortcomings in the traditional judicial system, reduce backlog of court cases and ensure speedy justice for the common man. Although not a permanent solution, FTCs continue to play an important role in expediting fair trials and justice in India.

In the previous post, we had shared information about The Right to Free Legal Aid: An Essential Protection, so read that post also.

Key Features of Fast Track Courts

Fast Track Courts (FTCs) were established in India in 2000 to reduce the immense backlog of cases pending in district courts. Some of the defining characteristics of FTCs include:

Expedited Trials

The primary objective of FTCs is to conduct speedy trials. They are required to dispose of cases within six months.To achieve this, FTCs follow relaxed procedures and limit adjournments. They also give priority to FTC cases over regular cases.

Relaxed Procedures

FTCs are exempt from certain provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to expedite the legal process. For example, FTCs can accept written statements in lieu of personal attendance in court for non-essential witnesses. They are also not bound by stringent rules regarding the framing and alteration of charges.

Limited Adjournments

FTCs limit the number of adjournments that can be granted to both prosecution and defense. Usually, not more than two adjournments are allowed to either party. This prevents unnecessary delays in the trial.

Priority in Trial

FTC cases take precedence over regular cases in the district courts. All FTC matters are heard and disposed of on priority before other cases. This priority trial of FTC cases also aids in faster dispensation of justice.

Composition of Judges

FTCs have a single judge instead of two judges like regular courts. The judge is selected from among the district judges or additional district judges. The single-judge bench further accelerates the trial process.

In conclusion, the distinguishing qualities of Fast Track Courts, including speedy trials, relaxed procedures, limited adjournments, priority in trial, and single-judge bench, make them an effective mechanism for reducing pendency and delays in the Indian judicial system. The FTCs have been instrumental in delivering swift justice in many cases.

Advantages of the Fast Track Court System

The Fast Track Court system has several advantages for the Indian judicial system.

Speedy Trials and Reduced Backlog of Cases

Fast Track Courts were established to reduce the immense backlog of cases in Indian courts. They are dedicated to disposing of cases within a fixed time period, ensuring speedy trials and justice. This helps reduce the number of undertrials in prisons and decreases the time innocent people may spend in jail awaiting trial.

Lower Costs

The Fast Track Court system utilizes existing infrastructure and staff, so it does not require major investments in additional resources. This allows the government to set up more courts at a lower cost. The speedy disposal of cases also reduces the money spent on undertrials in prisons.

Access to Justice

Fast Track Courts make the justice system more accessible to common people. They reduce the time and money required to pursue and conclude legal cases. This allows more people to seek justice through the courts rather than resorting to extralegal means.

Deterrent Effect

The swift dispensation of justice by Fast Track Courts acts as a deterrent against crime. When criminals are punished quickly, it helps prevent further offenses and instills fear of the law in others. This reinforces the rule of law and has a disciplining effect on society.

While Fast Track Courts aim to enhance access to justice, some argue they compromise fair trial standards and the quality of judgments. However, when implemented well with proper safeguards, Fast Track Courts play an important role in tackling judicial delays and pendency in India. They are a beneficial reform that strengthens the justice system and upholds the rule of law.

Criticisms and Shortcomings of Fast Track Courts

A major criticism of the fast track court system is the compromise of the quality of judgments delivered. The pressure to dispose of cases quickly could result in hurried trials and flawed verdicts. Some argue that the accelerated process prevents proper examination of evidence and arguments. There is a risk of miscarriage of justice due to hastily decided judgments.

Another concern is that fast track courts do not have the same level of independence and impartiality as regular courts. They are under the administrative control of the state governments that establish them. Judges in these courts may feel pressured to decide cases in a particular manner to satisfy political interests. This undermines the principles of fair trial and rule of law.

Fast track courts also face issues such as lack of infrastructure, shortage of funds and inadequately trained support staff. Heavy caseloads and limited time lead to difficulties in summoning witnesses, inadequate cross-examinations and limited scope for arguments. These constraints make it challenging to meet the objectives of speedy yet fair delivery of justice.

Critics argue that fast track courts do not provide a sustainable solution and divert attention from long-pending reforms in the regular judicial system. They are a temporary measure and most courts wind up after a few years due to lack of funds, leaving many cases pending. The root causes of delays and pendency in regular courts must be addressed through measures such as filling up vacancies, improving case management and using technology. Merely setting up special courts will not resolve systemic issues plaguing the Indian judiciary in the long run.

In summary, while fast track courts aim to enhance access to justice, they face many criticisms regarding the quality and fairness of judgments, lack of independence, inadequate infrastructure and their unsustainable nature. More broad-based reforms are required to build a robust, efficient and fair judicial system that provides speedy justice to all.

Notable Cases Handled by Fast Track Courts

Fast track courts in India have handled many high-profile and sensitive cases since their inception. Some of the most well-known cases include:

The Jessica Lall murder case: In 1999, model Jessica Lall was shot dead at a Delhi restaurant. The main accused, Manu Sharma, was acquitted by a lower court but later convicted of murder by the Delhi High Court in 2006. The High Court relied on evidence presented by a fast track court. Public outcry and campaigning by Lall’s sister led the case to be re-opened.

The Priyadarshini Mattoo murder case: In 1996, a law student named Priyadarshini Mattoo was found raped and murdered in her Delhi home. The prime suspect, Santosh Kumar Singh, was acquitted in 1999 but found guilty by a fast track court in 2006 after a sustained campaign by Mattoo’s parents and women’s groups.

The Shakti Mills gang rape case: In 2013, a 22-year-old photojournalist was gang-raped at the abandoned Shakti Mills compound in Mumbai. Five suspects were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment within 7 months by a fast track court. The quick conviction was praised and highlighted the need for fast track courts to try cases of violence against women.

The December 2012 Delhi gang rape case: In 2012, a 23-year-old woman was brutally gang raped in a moving bus in Delhi and later died of her injuries. Six suspects, including a minor, were tried in a fast track court. Four of the adult suspects were sentenced to death, while the minor was sent to a reform facility. The case led to tighter laws against sexual violence and the need for swift justice in such cases.

In summary, fast track courts in India have expedited the trials and convictions in many prominent cases related to murder, rape, and violence against women that deeply impacted society. By delivering speedy justice, these courts have addressed public sentiment and distrust in the regular court system. Their role in strengthening the rule of law and empowering victims of heinous crimes cannot be overstated.

The Impact of Fast Track Courts on Reducing Court Backlog

Fast Track Courts (FTCs) were established in India in 2000 to reduce the immense backlog of cases in district courts and high courts. FTCs focus on speedy trials and time-bound justice in certain categories of cases like those related to crimes against women, children, elderly, and the disadvantaged sections of society.

Reduced Pendency of Cases

The FTCs have significantly reduced the pendency of cases through speedy trials and time-bound delivery of judgements. According to surveys, the pendency of cases in FTCs is around 3 months compared to an average of 5-10 years in regular district courts. The quick disposal of cases by FTCs has resulted in providing speedy justice to victims and reduced overcrowding in jails by disposing of undertrial cases.

Increase in Conviction Rates

The FTCs have achieved a higher conviction rate of around 65% compared to 40-50% in regular courts. The speedy trials, curtailed adjournments and time-bound proceedings have resulted in greater witness availability and cooperation, improved quality of evidence, and enhanced supervision by judicial officers. These factors have collectively improved the conviction rates in FTCs.

Challenges in the Functioning of FTCs

While FTCs have successfully achieved their objective of speedy justice and reduced pendency, they face several challenges like lack of adequate infrastructure, shortage of judges and staff, and high attrition rates of judges. FTC judges also face difficulties in dealing with uncooperative and influential accused and witnesses. There is a need for providing more autonomy and independence to FTC judges for effective functioning. Continuous training and sensitization of FTC judges and staff can help in addressing these issues.

In summary, Fast Track Courts have significantly sped up the judicial process and enhanced access to justice for citizens in India. With continued government support and necessary reforms, FTCs can achieve the goal of complete elimination of backlog and speedy justice for all.

Suggestions for Improving the Fast Track Court System

To strengthen the Fast Track Court system in India, several enhancements could be implemented:

Increase the Number of Judges and Courts

Fast Track Courts were established to reduce the immense backlog of cases in India’s court system. However, with over 3 million pending cases across India, the current number of dedicated Fast Track Court judges and facilities are insufficient. Augmenting the number of judges, courts and their geographic distribution can help improve access to swift justice for citizens across India.

Expand Jurisdiction to Include More Cases

At present, Fast Track Courts only have jurisdiction over certain offenses like rape, dacoity, kidnapping, dowry deaths and civil disputes relating to property. Broadening the scope of cases under Fast Track Court purview to include other offenses and case types can make these courts more effective in delivering timely justice. Some suggestions include cyber crimes, check bounce cases, cases under Negotiable Instruments Act as well as Motor Vehicle Act violations.

Improve Infrastructure and Facilities

Providing Fast Track Court judges and staff with improved infrastructure, technology and facilities can enhance their productivity and efficiency. This includes adequate courtrooms, case management systems, video conferencing equipment, and a sufficient number of clerks, stenographers and other support staff. With better tools and resources, Fast Track Courts can operate more effectively.

Increase Transparency and Accessibility

Steps should be taken to make the Fast Track Court system more transparent, accountable and accessible to the public. Details on case statuses, judgments, daily court proceedings should be available on public websites. Providing information on legal rights and the Fast Track Court process in local languages can make these courts more accessible to all citizens. Overall, increasing transparency and accessibility can build trust in the Fast Track Court system.

With targeted improvements and continued support, Fast Track Courts have the potential to significantly transform India’s legal system and ensure swift, equitable access to justice for all.

FAQs on Fast Track Courts in India: Your Top Questions Answered

Fast Track Courts (FTCs) were established in India in 2000 to reduce the huge backlog of cases pending in various courts. They are meant to provide speedy justice in a time-bound manner. Here are some frequently asked questions about FTCs:

Q1: What types of cases are handled by FTCs?

FTCs primarily handle cases related to crimes against women such as rape, sexual harassment, dowry deaths, etc. They also take up cases of child abuse, senior citizens’ issues, and other marginalized groups. In some states, FTCs have been designated to hear property and civil disputes as well.

Q2: How are FTCs different from regular courts?

FTCs have been set up exclusively to expedite the legal process and pass quick judgments and verdicts. They follow relaxed procedures and have fixed timelines for various stages of a trial. FTCs conduct speedy day-to-day trials, with limited adjournments. They also have powers to pass sentences that match those of a Court of Sessions. Regular courts, on the other hand, follow standard procedures and timeframes laid out in the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Q3: What is the timeline for cases in FTCs?

FTCs aim to complete the trial and deliver the judgment within 6 to 12 months. The appeal against the FTC verdict has to be made within 90 days to the High Court. The High Court, in turn, needs to decide on the appeal within 6 months. This expedited process helps in reducing delays and pendency of cases that languish for years in the regular court system.

Q4: What is the future of FTCs in India?

FTCs have helped tremendously in reducing the backlog of cases and providing speedy justice, especially for marginalized sections of society. However, there is still a long way to go in tackling the huge pendency of cases in Indian courts. The central and state governments need to establish more FTCs across the country, provide them adequate infrastructure and funding, and bring more types of cases under their jurisdiction. FTCs can play an important role in reforming the Indian judicial system if they receive continued support and priority. Overall, the future of FTCs seems positive, given their usefulness and necessity.

Disclaimer

The information and services on this website are not intended to and shall not be used as legal advice. You should consult a Legal Professional for any legal or solicited advice. While we have good faith and our own independent research to every information listed on the website and do our best to ensure that the data provided is accurate. However, we do not guarantee the information provided is accurate and make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information on the Site. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL WE HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE SITE. YOUR USE OF THE SITE AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION ON THE SITE IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers so the accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed.

So friends, today we talked about Role and Impact of Fast Track Courts in the Indian Judicial System, hope you liked our post.

If you liked the information about Role and Impact of Fast Track Courts in the Indian Judicial System, then definitely share this article with your friends.


Knowing about laws can make you feel super smart ! If you find value in the content you may consider joining our not for profit Legal Community ! You can ask unlimited questions on WhatsApp and get answers. You can DM or send your name & number to 8208309918 on WhatsApp


Model Code of Conduct, Lawforeverything
Previous Story

The Purpose and Implementation of the Model Code of Conduct

Hit and Run New Law in India, Lawforeverything
Next Story

Hit and Run New Law in India

Latest from Blog

Classification of Cyber Crimes - Lawforeverything

Classification of Cyber Crimes

On this page you will read detailed information about Classification of Cyber Crimes. Introduction In the digital age, cyber crimes have emerged as a major threat to individuals, organizations, and nations. Cyber…
What is Marine Insurance - Lawforeverything

What is Marine Insurance?

On this page you will read detailed information about Marine Insurance Meaning. Introduction Marine insurance is a specialized type of insurance designed to protect businesses, shipowners, and other stakeholders from the risks…
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Hierarchy of Courts in India, Lawforeverything

Hierarchy of Courts in India and Judicial System

On this page you will read detailed information about Hierarchy
Did you know it is illegal to drive shirtless in Thailand? Law and Order: Canada’s Top 10 Legal Landmarks “In the Shadows of the Cubicles: Unveiling Workplace Sexual Harassment In USA Forbidden Brews: Exploring 10 Countries Where Alcohol is Banned Unveiling Injustice: Stories of Human Rights Violations in 10 Countries Behind Bars: Exploring the World’s Most Notorious Prisons Masterminds of Mayhem: Unveiling the Top 10 Criminals Worldwide Behind the Curtain: Unveiling 10 Fascinating Truths About North Korea Exploring the 10 Most Censored Countries Green Havens: Exploring Countries Where Cannabis is Legal