On this page you will read detailed information about Limitation Act 1963.
As you examine the key provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963, you will gain critical insight into this legislation that establishes time limits for initiating legal proceedings in India. Analyzing the objectives, scope, and implications of this act allows you to fully comprehend a law that significantly impacts access to justice. Reviewing relevant case law also aids your understanding of how courts have interpreted various clauses. Arm yourself with knowledge of this powerful statute governing time bars so you can advocate your position from an informed vantage point or provide clients sound counsel on pursuing claims. This guide equips you to navigate this act shaping legal recourse.
What Is the Limitation Act 1963?
The Limitation Act, 1963 is an Act of Parliament of India that was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to the limitation of suits and other proceedings. In essence, the Act prescribes the time limits for different suits and applications in civil matters.
The Act was passed to ensure certainty and finality in legal proceedings. As time passes, evidence may disappear, memories may fade, and circumstances may change. The Limitation Act provides statutory timeframes within which a suit or proceeding must be initiated to avoid being time-barred.
Some key provisions and time periods specified in the Limitation Act, 1963 include:
- Suits relating to accounts: 3 years from the date the cause of action arises.
- Suits for compensation for malicious prosecution: 1 year from the date of acquittal.
- Suits for compensation for wrongful imprisonment: 1 year from the date of release from prison.
- Suits for recovery of possession of immovable property: 12 years from the date the cause of action arises.
- Suits for specific performance of a contract: 3 years from the date the contract is broken.
- Applications for review of judgments or orders: 90 days from the date of the judgment or order.
- Appeals against orders of specified tribunals: 90 days from the date of the order.
The time limits prescribed under the Act may be extended or condoned in certain circumstances, such as when the plaintiff has knowledge of the cause of action after the expiry of the prescribed period or when the plaintiff is under a legal disability at the time of the cause of action. The court has the discretion to allow an extension of time in such cases.
In summary, the Limitation Act, 1963 aims to bring finality to legal proceedings and provides certainty in the law. By specifying timelines for various suits and applications, it prevents parties from sleeping over their rights and then re-agitating stale claims.
Purpose and Scope of the Limitation Act
The Limitation Act, 1963 aims to provide legal certainty and finality to legal proceedings. It sets time limits for different suits and applications
Key Provisions in the Limitation Act, 1963
The Limitation Act, 1963 specifies the time period within which a suit or proceeding must be instituted in a court of law. The Act provides for limitations of suits on different types of suits, applications and appeals. The time limit for any suit or proceeding begins from the date on which the right to initiate proceedings accrues.
Some key provisions in the Act are:
Limitation Period for Civil Suits
- The limitation period for most civil suits relating to contracts, torts, etc. is 3 years from the date of accrual of the right to sue. For suits relating to declaration of title and recovery of movable property, the period is 6 years.
- The period of limitation in the case of suit for compensation for false imprisonment is 1 year and for malicious prosecution is 2 years.
Extension of Limitation Period
- The limitation period can be extended by a written acknowledgment of liability or by payment of part of the claim before the expiry of the period of limitation. The period of limitation gets extended by a further 3 years from the date of acknowledgment or payment.
- In
Time Limits for Different Types of Legal Claims
When pursuing legal claims, it is important to be aware of limitation periods—the maximum time period within which a claim must be filed. Failure to initiate a claim within the prescribed limitation period will result in the claim becoming time-barred, meaning you lose the right to recover damages or remedy the situation.
In the previous post, we had shared information about Navigating India’s National Waterways Act of 2016, so read that post also.
Contract Claims
For claims arising out of a breach of contract, the limitation period is six years from the date of the breach under the Limitation Act, 1963. This includes claims for unpaid invoices, defective goods or services, or violations of contract terms.
Tort Claims
Tort claims, such as claims for negligence, nuisance, or trespass to land must be brought within six years of the date the cause of action accrued. The ‘date of accrual’ refers to the date on which the claimant first had knowledge of the injury. For example, in a claim for medical malpractice, the limitation period runs from the date the claimant first became aware of the negligent act or omission by the healthcare provider that resulted in injury.
Property Damage Claims
Claims relating to damage to property must be brought within six years of the date the damage occurred. This includes claims for damage due to flooding, fire, subsidence or third-party negligence or nuisance. The clock starts running from the date the property was damaged, not the date the damage was discovered.
Personal Injury Claims
Personal injury claims, such as claims for injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident or workplace accident, must also be brought within six years. The limitation period runs from the date the accident occurred or the date the injury was first discovered. For injuries that develop over time, such as industrial diseases or illnesses, the limitation period runs from the date the claimant first had knowledge of the injury and its cause.
In summary, most common types of legal claims are subject to a six-year limitation period under the Limitation Act, 1963. It is important to be mindful of relevant limitation dates to avoid losing the right to pursue a valid legal claim due to the passage of time. Consulting with a lawyer regarding specific claims is advisable to confirm applicable limitation periods and key dates.
When the Clock Starts Ticking: Accrual of the Cause of Action
To determine if a suit is within the limitation period, it is critical to identify when the ‘cause of action’ accrued. Under the Act, a cause of action accrues when the right to sue arises. This usually occurs when the breach of contract or duty occurred, or the tort was committed.
The date of knowledge refers to when the plaintiff first knew or ought to have known, through reasonable diligence, the material facts that give rise to the cause of action. For most cases, time begins to run from the date when the wrong was done or the contract was broken. However, there are exceptions for cases where damage or loss was not immediately apparent.
In cases of fraud or mistake, time begins to run from the date when the plaintiff discovered the fraud or mistake, or could have discovered it with reasonable diligence. Similarly, for negligence claims where damage was not immediately apparent, time may begin to run only when the plaintiff knew or should have known of the damage.
For continuing breaches of contract or continuing torts, a new limitation period begins each day the breach or tort continues. In these cases, the plaintiff can only claim for damages incurred within the limitation period before filing the suit.
It is important to note that in some cases, the limitation clock may be paused or suspended for a period. This includes:
- Minors: For minors, the limitation period only begins to run from the date of attaining majority.
- Disability: For persons with a mental disability, time does not run for the duration of the disability.
- Arbitration: When a dispute is submitted to arbitration, limitation is suspended for the duration of the arbitration proceedings.
- Acknowledgment of liability: When the defendant acknowledges liability, the clock resets and a new limitation period begins from the date of acknowledgment.
- Stayed proceedings: When a court stays proceedings or grants an injunction, time ceases to run for the duration of the stay or injunction.
Understanding when the limitation clock starts and stops ticking for your particular cause of action is key to ensuring your suit is filed within the prescribed period. Failure to do so will result in your suit being time-barred.
Pausing the Limitation Period: Grounds for Extension
There are several circumstances under which the limitation period may be extended or paused. According to Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, if a person entitled to institute a suit or proceeding is under a legal disability, the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the disability ceases. The legal disabilities recognized under the Act are:
- Minority: The limitation period shall not run against a minor plaintiff until he attains majority.
- Insanity: If the plaintiff is of unsound mind or mentally incompetent, the limitation period shall remain suspended during the continuance of such mental infirmity.
- Imprisonment: If the plaintiff is imprisoned for a term of one year or more under any law, the limitation period shall not run against them during the period of such imprisonment.
Additionally, under Section 6 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the limitation period may be extended in cases of fraud or mistake. Where the plaintiff can prove that the defendant fraudulently concealed facts that are material to the plaintiff’s cause of action, the limitation period shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud or could have discovered it with reasonable diligence.
Where there is an unintentional mistake on part of the plaintiff, and such mistake is of a nature as to afford reasonable ground for the plaintiff to consider that he has no cause of action, the limitation period shall not begin to run until the mistake is discovered. However, the plaintiff must show that the mistake was not attributable to their negligence.
In conclusion, grounds for extension or suspension of the limitation period include legal disability of the plaintiff such as minority, unsoundness of mind or imprisonment, as well as cases of fraud or mistake that prevents the plaintiff from pursuing their cause of action. By taking advantage of these provisions, potential plaintiffs can safeguard their right to litigate claims that would otherwise be time-barred.
The Effect of Expiry of Limitation Period
Once the limitation period for a particular case expires, the legal remedy in that case also expires. This means that after the expiry of the limitation period, an aggrieved person cannot pursue the case in a court of law.
For instance, let’s say a person has a claim to file a civil suit for recovery of money against another person. As per the Limitation Act, the limitation period for such a case is 3 years. If the person fails to file the suit within 3 years from the date the cause of action arose, then he loses his right to file the suit. His legal remedy expires with the expiry of the limitation period.
The expiration of the limitation period renders the case time-barred. The court will not entertain a time-barred case and will dismiss it at the threshold. The defendant can take the plea of limitation and prove that the case has been filed after the expiry of the limitation period. If the court accepts this plea, the plaintiff’s suit will be dismissed.
However, there are certain exceptions in which a time-barred case can still be heard by the court:
- If the plaintiff was a minor or of unsound mind during the limitation period, then the limitation period will start running from the date the minor attains majority or the person of unsound mind attains soundness of mind.
- If there is a fraud on the part of the defendant due to which the plaintiff could not file the suit within the limitation period, then the court can condone the delay.
- If there is an acknowledgment of liability by the defendant before the expiry of limitation period, then a fresh limitation period starts from the date of such acknowledgment.
- If the case involves a continuing cause of action, then a fresh limitation period starts with the cessation of the continuing wrong or injury.
In conclusion, the expiry of limitation period for a particular case renders the legal remedy for that case time-barred, with certain exceptions where the court can still condone the delay and entertain the case. The aggrieved person should adhere to the limitation periods prescribed under the Limitation Act to safeguard their legal rights.
Recent Developments and Amendments to the Act
In recent years, there have been several amendments made to the Limitation Act, 1963 to address emerging needs and close certain loopholes. Some of the most significant changes are:
Amendment of 2005
The Amendment Act of 2005 introduced a uniform period of limitation of three years for suits relating to accounts, contracts, torts and other civil disputes. Prior to this amendment, different periods of limitation applied for different types of civil suits which led to unnecessary litigation. This amendment brought uniformity and certainty in the law.
Amendment of 2010
The Amendment Act of 2010 was enacted to enable the government to exclude certain periods from the time limit for instituting legal proceedings in deserving and appropriate cases. The Central Government now has the power to exempt any suit, appeal or application from the purview of the Limitation Act if it is satisfied that it is in public interest to do so.
Amendment of 2013
The Amendment Act of 2013 expanded the scope of Section 5 of the Limitation Act which provides for the exclusion of time in certain cases. The amendment stipulated that in case of a pending civil proceeding initiated by a plaintiff, the period during which the plaintiff could not pursue the proceeding due to any stay order or injunction issued by any court shall be excluded in computing the limitation period applicable for that proceeding. This ensured that plaintiffs do not suffer merely due to pendency of interim applications before the court.
Pending Amendment Bill of 2018
The Limitation (Amendment) Bill of 2018 seeks to amend the Schedule to the Limitation Act to prescribe limitation periods for commercial disputes. The Bill aims to reduce the standard limitation period for commercial disputes from three years to two years. It also specifies limitation periods for certain commercial disputes like contracts relating to sale or lease of goods or services, partnership disputes, etc. The amendment is pending approval from Rajya Sabha.
In summary, the Limitation Act 1963 continues to evolve to address new areas and ensure timely conclusion of legal proceedings. The amendments made in recent years have been progressive and balanced, upholding principles of natural justice and equity.
FAQs on Limitation Act 1963: Your Top Questions Answered
The Limitation Act, 1963 establishes certain time periods within which legal proceedings in respect of certain types of claims and offenses can be initiated. If a suit or proceeding is filed after the expiry of the limitation period, the court may dismiss it as “barred by limitation”.
Q1: What are the different limitation periods under the Limitation Act?
The Limitation Act prescribes limitation periods for different types of suits, appeals, and applications. The main categories are:
I) Suits relating to accounts, contracts, torts: 3 years from when the right to sue arises.
II) Suits for possession of immovable property: 12 years from when the right to sue arises.
III) Suits for recovery of money charged upon immovable property: 12 years from when the right to sue arises.
IV) Suits upon a judgment or decree: 12 years from when the judgment or decree becomes enforceable.
V) Suits for compensation for false imprisonment: 1 year from when the right to sue arises.
Q2: When does the period of limitation begin to run?
The period of limitation begins to run from the date when the right to sue first accrues to the plaintiff/ applicant/ petitioner. This means the date on which the cause of action arises. The exact date of accrual depends on the nature of the suit. For example, in suits for damages for breach of contract, the limitation period begins from the date of the breach. In cases of continuing breaches, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at each breach.
Q3: What happens if the limitation period expires?
If a suit is filed after the expiry of the limitation period, the court will dismiss the suit as “barred by law of limitation”. This means the plaintiff loses the right to file a suit for that particular cause of action. However, in certain circumstances, the court has the discretion to condone the delay and extend the limitation period. This is known as “condonation of delay”. The court will condone the delay only on reasonable grounds and after satisfying itself that the delay was not intentional.
In summary, the Limitation Act aims to provide certainty and finality in legal affairs. At the same time, it ensures that the rights of diligent litigants are protected by providing reasonable periods of time within which they may pursue their legal remedies. Understanding the limitation periods for different claims can help avoid losing the right to pursue a legitimate legal remedy.
Conclusion
As you have seen, the Limitation Act of 1963 is a crucial piece of legislation that sets time limits for pursuing legal claims in India. By understanding the key provisions, time periods, and recent amendments, you can make informed decisions regarding your legal rights. When faced with potential causes of action, be sure to consider limitation periods from the outset. Seek legal advice to determine how this law may apply in your specific circumstances. Knowledge of limitation statutes empowers citizens to uphold their interests in a timely, thoughtful manner. Moving forward, stay abreast of changes to the Act through reputable legal resources.
Disclaimer
The information and services on this website are not intended to and shall not be used as legal advice. You should consult a Legal Professional for any legal or solicited advice. While we have good faith and our own independent research to every information listed on the website and do our best to ensure that the data provided is accurate. However, we do not guarantee the information provided is accurate and make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information on the Site. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL WE HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE SITE. YOUR USE OF THE SITE AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION ON THE SITE IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers so the accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed.
So friends, today we talked about Limitation Act 1963, hope you liked our post.
If you liked the information about Limitation Act 1963, then definitely share this article with your friends.
Knowing about laws can make you feel super smart ! If you find value in the content you may consider joining our not for profit Legal Community ! You can ask unlimited questions on WhatsApp and get answers. You can DM or send your name & number to 8208309918 on WhatsApp
